Skip to main content
  • This website sets cookies on your device. To find out more about how we use cookies please refer to our Privacy and Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the site, we’ll assume that you are content for us to set these on your device.
  • Close
Home > Prudential Regulation Authority > Contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law – CP19/15

Contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law – CP19/15

26 May 2015


A key aspect of effective resolution is ensuring that, once a firm enters resolution, its counterparties in derivatives and other financial contracts (such as repo/reverse repo, securities lending and other similar transactions subject to contractual set-off and netting arrangements) cannot terminate and ‘close out’ their positions solely as a result of the firm’s (or a related entity’s) entry into resolution.

The Banking Act 2009 (Banking Act) gives the Bank of England, as resolution authority, the power to suspend (or ‘stay’) temporarily the termination rights of a party to a contract with a firm in resolution, provided that the UK institution continues to perform its payment and other substantive obligations under the contract (the temporary stay).   It further provides that a resolution action (or pre-resolution action) by the Bank of England, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) or the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) cannot give rise to a counterparty’s right to terminate a contract with a UK credit institution or investment firm or to exercise rights over collateral (the general stay).

The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (Directive 2014/59/EU) (BRRD) ensures that a UK stay would automatically be recognised and given effect throughout the European Union (EU).  Where a contract is governed by the law of a non-EU jurisdiction, however, it is unclear that a court in that jurisdiction would enforce the UK stay over the contractual terms unless the law of that jurisdiction expressly recognises foreign resolution actions.

The proposal is part of a coordinated effort among member authorities of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) to improve cross-border recognition of resolution stays by obliging firms to adopt contractual solutions where statutory recognition regimes are lacking.

This consultation is relevant to UK banks and building societies, PRA-designated investment firms and their qualifying parent undertakings, which for this purpose comprise financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies; as well as credit institutions, investment firms, and financial institutions that are subsidiaries of these firms.  The consultation and proposed rule are also relevant to counterparties of the above-listed entities to the extent that counterparties have financial contracts with such entities governed by non-EEA law.

Summary of the proposals covered by the CP

This consultation paper proposes a new rule for the PRA Rulebook requiring the contractual adoption of UK resolution stays in certain financial contracts governed by the law of a jurisdiction outside the European Economic Area (EEA) (a ‘third country’).

The proposed rule would apply to UK banks, building societies and designated investment firms as well as their qualifying parent undertakings (‘firms’) in respect of financial contracts (such as for derivative, repo/reverse repo or securities financing transactions) governed by the law of a non-EEA jurisdiction.  It would prohibit firms from creating new obligations or materially amending an existing obligation under such a financial contract without the required counterparty agreement.  The prohibition applies unless the counterparty has agreed in writing to be subject to similar restrictions on termination, acceleration, close-out, set-off and netting as would apply as a result of the firm’s entry into resolution, or the write-down or conversion of the firm’s regulatory capital at the point of non-viability, if the contract were governed by the laws of the UK (and, where the relevant firm is not a credit institution or investment firm, as if it were one).

Firms would also be obliged to ensure that, where their subsidiary credit institutions, investment firms and financial institutions trade in these products under third-country law, the subsidiaries, regardless of location, also obtain agreement to the stay from their counterparties.


This consultation closed on Wednesday 26 August 2015.

Please address comments or enquiries to  

The PRA will consider the feedback received and will publish a policy statement with the final rule towards the end of 2015.

Consultation paper
Contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law – CP19/15

Final policy in relation to this consultation is available under related links.