Research work published by the Bank
is intended to contribute to debate, and does not necessarily
reflect the views of the Bank or of MPC members.
The impact of government spending on demand pressure (360k)
(by Bob Hills and Ryland Thomas of the Bank’s Structural Economic Analysis Division and Tony Yates of the Bank’s Monetary Assessment and Strategy Division). When assessing the outlook for inflation, the growth of real GDP is commonly used as an indicator of changes in current demand pressures. But as GDP includes the output of the government sector, this approach can in some circumstances be misleading. Government output is not necessarily an informative guide to the impact of government spending on the balance of demand and supply pressures in the marketed sector of the economy. Instead, it may be more informative to consider the quantity of resources that the government absorbs - that is, how much private sector output it buys and how much labour it hires - rather than the quantity of output it produces.
How important is housing market activity for durables spending? (393k)
(by Andrew Benito and Rob Wood of the Bank’s Structural Economic Analysis Division). The links between the housing market and consumer spending have been the source of much debate. In this article we examine the evidence for a link between housing transactions and consumer spending, which could exist if households were more likely to purchase some goods and services when they move home. Using survey data from the British Household Panel Survey we find that households are two to three times more likely to purchase certain durable goods when they move home. But those households that move home are a small proportion of all households: so in aggregate a change in housing transactions seems likely to have only a moderate impact on durables spending. Estimates of the extent of the overall effect are, however, subject to considerable uncertainty. Furthermore, any such link can only affect spending in the short run and cannot influence consumer spending in the medium term.
The inflation-targeting framework from an historical perspective (583k)
(by Luca Benati of the Bank’s Monetary Assessment and Strategy Division). This article provides an historical perspective on the post-1992 inflation-targeting regime in the United Kingdom. It assesses nearly 400 years of UK economic history using three alternative gauges of stability: business-cycle fluctuations, the Phillips correlation between inflation and unemployment and the degree of inflation persistence. The first of these measures suggests that the inflation-targeting regime has been characterised by the most stable macroeconomic environment in recorded UK history. The second points to a significant improvement in the stability of the Phillips inflation-unemployment correlation during the post-1992 period. The third stability measure suggests that inflation persistence in the United Kingdom has been the exception, not the rule.
Monetary policy news and market reaction to the Inflation Report and MPC Minutes (279k)
(by James Bell of the Bank’s Conjunctural Assessment and Projections Division and Rob in Windle of the Bank’s Sterling Markets Division). This article describes the results of analysis carried out as background for the speech ‘Inflation targeting in practice: models, forecasts and hunches’, by Rachel Lomax, Deputy Governor for Monetary Policy, which is reproduced in this edition of the Quarterly Bulletin. It examines the reactions of both economists and financial markets to different MPC announcements: the policy statement release immediately after the interest rate meeting; the Minutes of that meeting; and the Inflation Report. This article also examines whether the amount of perceived ‘news’ contained in interest rate decisions has changed since the MPC was established in 1997.
|