Skip to main content
  • This website sets cookies on your device. To find out more about how we use cookies please refer to our Privacy and Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the site, we’ll assume that you are content for us to set these on your device.
  • Close
Home > Research > Working Paper No. 510: Institutional investor portfolio allocation, quantitative easing and the global financial crisis - Michael A S Joyce, Zhuoshi Liu and Ian Tonks
 

Working Paper No. 510: Institutional investor portfolio allocation, quantitative easing and the global financial crisis - Michael A S Joyce, Zhuoshi Liu and Ian Tonks

12 September 2014

​Working Paper No. 510
Institutional investor portfolio allocation, quantitative easing and the global financial crisis
(982KB)
Michael A S Joyce, Zhuoshi Liu and Ian Tonks

We examine how the Bank of England’s quantitative easing (QE) policy during the global financial crisis affected the investment behaviour of insurance companies and pension funds and whether their behaviour was consistent with the operation of the so-called 'portfolio balance channel' that has been emphasised by UK and US monetary policy makers as a key channel through which QE works. To assess the incremental impact of QE, we need some counterfactual of how the investment behaviour of institutional investors would have changed in the absence of the policy. We construct this by conditioning on variables that explain portfolio allocation but are invariant to the QE policy itself, which allows us to construct both ex-ante and ex-post counterfactuals. Our analysis of a range of data sources, including national accounts net investment data and micro-data on life insurance companies and pension funds, suggests QE led to institutional investors shifting their portfolios away from gilts towards corporate bonds relative to the counterfactual. Although analysis of the micro-data does suggest some heterogeneity in the response to QE across different institutions, the shift into corporate bonds was quite widespread. However, portfolio rebalancing by institutional investors into riskier assets seems to have been limited to corporate bonds and did not extend to equities.

Share