Skip to main content
  • This website sets cookies on your device. To find out more about how we use cookies please refer to our Privacy and Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the site, we’ll assume that you are content for us to set these on your device.
  • Close
Home > Research > Staff Working Paper No. 594: Non-performing loans: regulatory and accounting treatments of assets - David Bholat, Rosa Lastra, Sheri Markose, Andrea Miglionico and Kallol Sen
 

Staff Working Paper No. 594: Non-performing loans: regulatory and accounting treatments of assets - David Bholat, Rosa Lastra, Sheri Markose, Andrea Miglionico and Kallol Sen

22 April 2016

​Staff Working Paper No. 594: Non-performing loans: regulatory and accounting treatments of assets
David Bholat, Rosa Lastra, Sheri Markose, Andrea Miglionico and Kallol Sen

Asset quality is an essential part of sound banking. However, asset quality is difficult for banking regulators and investors to assess in the absence of a common, cross-border scheme to classify assets. Currently no standard is applied universally to classify loans, the most sizable asset on many banks’ balance sheets. As a corollary, no common definition of non-performing loans (NPLs) exists. This paper documents divergences in the definition of NPLs across countries, accounting regimes, firms and data sources. The paper’s originality is in attending to the legal, accounting, statistical, economic and strategic aspects of loan loss provisioning (LLP) and NPLs, topics that are multidisciplinary by nature but have not been dealt with in the literature in an integrated fashion before. Since the 2007 Great Financial Crisis (GFC), accounting bodies and prudential regulators are increasingly focused on early recognition of credit losses and enhanced disclosure. A common approach to NPL recognition might complement these initiatives.

Share