We use necessary cookies to make our site work (for example, to manage your session). We’d also like to use some non-essential cookies (including third-party cookies) to help us improve the site. By clicking ‘Accept recommended settings’ on this banner, you accept our use of optional cookies.
Necessary cookies
Analytics cookies
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Necessary cookies
Necessary cookies enable core functionality on our website such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
Analytics cookies
We use analytics cookies so we can keep track of the number of visitors to various parts of the site and understand how our website is used. For more information on how these cookies work please see our Cookie policy.
The sensitivity of aggregate consumption to human wealth
Working papers set out research in progress by our staff, with the aim of encouraging comments and debate.
Published on
27 January 2000
Working Paper no. 108
By Hasan Bakhshi
The Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) assumes that individuals base their decisions on lifetime wealth, not current income. Textbook versions of the PIH predict that the elasticity of consumption with respect to human wealth is equal to the share of human wealth in total wealth. Comparing calibrated wealth shares with econometrically estimated elasticities amounts to a simple test of the PIH. In the United Kingdom, aggregate consumption is found to be more sensitive to changes in human wealth than is predicted by the PIH. This does not appear to be explained by a simple, but common, treatment of credit constraints.
The sensitivity of aggregate consumption to human wealth